I do not agree with that. Let us face it, under the system that the Government propose, even though it is not independent, there must be a fact-finding process before moving on to a fault-finding process. The Government themselves propose that there should be independent medical experts, who, by their nature, will presumably not be employed by the trust in question, so there will be a degree of independent scrutiny. Frankly, that must be essential because in the absence of independent scrutiny, I am sure that patients would not regard the outcome of an investigation—whether in the form that the Government propose or that which we propose—as having the necessary validity for them to accept any kind of redress. There must be a degree of independence.
NHS Redress Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Lansley
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 5 June 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on NHS Redress Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
447 c38 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 12:50:26 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_327436
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_327436
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_327436