Given that one of the main drivers for reform is the decline in the dependency ratio over forthcoming decades, why did the Government opt for the tax-funded proposal outlined today, rather than an investment-funded one? Was such a proposal considered, and, if so, why was it thought less preferable than the one outlined today?
Pensions Reform
Proceeding contribution from
Justine Greening
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 25 May 2006.
It occurred during Ministerial statement on Pensions Reform.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
446 c1663
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 12:42:04 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_327167
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_327167
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_327167