Surely any fireman worth his salt, on seeing a patch of heather on fire and noticing that a farmer was attending to it and had it under control, would turn the fire engine round and go back. That would be the common-sense approach of anyone working in the fire service.
Having reflected on what the right hon. Member for Swansea, West (Mr. Williams) and the Minister had to say, I think that there is some force in the argument that if one lists certain defences in a Bill, the assumption will be made that the list is exhaustive. I have also reflected further during this short but very constructive debate on the fact that the Bill contains the phrase ““without reasonable excuse””. A good lawyer could bring most of the concerns that I have identified within the scope of those three words, and on that basis I beg to ask leave to withdraw the motion.
Motion and clause, by leave, withdrawn.
Emergency Workers (Obstruction) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Greg Knight
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Friday, 12 May 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Emergency Workers (Obstruction) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
446 c672-3 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 10:57:01 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323938
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323938
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323938