I am grateful for that very considered response. I am also grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Sharman, for his support. Obviously I have listened carefully to the Minister. The noble Lord, Lord Sharman, made it clear that we are dealing with the evolution of voluntary disclosure. I do not flatter the Minister when I say he has had a distinguished business commercial career outside the House. He therefore understands the push and the pull underlying this clause. The concern is that once you hand this power to his successors, it will not always necessarily be used as sensibly as I am sure the Minister would use it. It is very widely drawn and extensive in the powers it gives to his successors; that is one of our concerns. We have no problem with enhancing shareholder engagement. Indeed, our discussions on Part 9 were exactly about that. I think we need to talk to people outside and read carefully what the Minister has said. We need to see whether his remarks carry any weight outside and to consult further. But for tonight, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Clause 866 [Disclosure of information under the Enterprise Act 2002]:
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 16 May 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c248-9 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 20:21:53 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322342
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322342
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322342