My Lords, we have discussed the persons subject to the offence, and we will come back in the amendments to the position of those who are directors of corporate bodies standing behind a bid. We debated this in Grand Committee. I emphasise that we have looked at that. I hope noble Lords will recognise that in this area, as in others, we have listened very carefully to what has been said by Members opposite, those on the Liberal Democrat Benches, and others who have participated. Where we have seen that there is a point, we have responded to it. We responded very substantially earlier today to the amendments I have been dealing with concerning auditors’ liability and directors’ duties. We have looked at this and seen that there is a need to make some refinements to those who are subject to it. As the Government responsible for implementing the directive, we take the view that unless we have an offence—albeit a light-touch offence—we will not be meeting the terms of the directive.
There are good reasons why the panel’s powers would not be adequate if it was not prepared to exercise those powers after the event. That area needs to be met. Where the Government have taken the view that they need to do something to meet their international obligations, the House would be very slow indeed not to accept that, particularly given that, at the end of the day, the only person at risk would be somebody who knew that an offer document did not comply and was reckless as to whether it complied, but went ahead with it anyway.
The noble Lord, Lord Patten, was concerned that this might frighten practitioners. Someone who knows that he is putting forward a document that is non-compliant or is reckless about doing so should, in a sense, be frightened. He ought to be doing it right. I am sure that those participating in this debate have been personally involved in offer documentation, as I have, and know the huge amount of attention that all practitioners pay to what is going on. Only someone who is really reckless or intent on breaking the rules will find themselves in breach of this provision.
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Goldsmith
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 16 May 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c207 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 20:20:30 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322252
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322252
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322252