My Lords, I shall not repeat everything that the noble Baroness said about our thanks for how the Government have responded to the concerns expressed in Committee. We now have a workable series of clauses that respond to our original concerns. Although my name is not attached to Amendment No. 391A, the issue that remains—albeit one for which there should be an explanation—is from what point in time the damage accrues. In these sorts of cases, we will be dealing with loss or profit, which may continue over a long period—for example, if an audit mistake is made at point X but the claim is that the profits or losses occurred sometime after that. An explanation of that will be very valuable.
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Sharman
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 16 May 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c159-60 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 00:57:52 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322166
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322166
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322166