had given notice of her intention to move, as an amendment to Amendment No. 363, Amendment No. 364:"Line 5, leave out ““authorities”” and insert ““authority””"
The noble Baroness said: My Lords, the Minister has dealt much better on Report with the issues raised by the amendments in this group than he did at Grand Committee. Had he given that explanation at Grand Committee, I would not have tabled the amendments at this stage. As the noble Lord knows, I am a fighter against waste in government and I was seeking to avoid the DTI creating a new department of auditor resignations, replete with staff at all grades, ready with their filing systems and processes to take lots of reports. In the light of the Minister’s explanation, I am satisfied on that point and I shall not move the amendment.
[Amendment No. 364, as an amendment to Amendment No. 363, not moved.]
[Amendments Nos. 365 and 366, as amendments to Amendment No. 363, not moved.]
On Question, Amendment No. 363 agreed to.
[Amendments Nos. 367 and 368 not moved.]
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Noakes
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 16 May 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c156-7 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 23:40:54 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322159
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322159
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322159