I was the other person on the telephone listening to the noble Lord, Lord Bradshaw, briefing the noble Earl, Lord Mar and Kellie. I certainly do not intend to repeat any of the arguments that he has used. However, I should declare an interest as chairman of the Railway Heritage Committee and as a member of the legal affairs committee of the Heritage Railway Association. My particular concern with this order relates to heritage railways.
As the noble Earl said, a derogation of two years is proposed by the Government in these regulations, but it is extraordinary that there is not a permanent derogation, because the new arrangements are not intended to apply to those sorts of railways. Heritage railways are an important part of our nation’s tourist industry: 105 heritage railways are open to the public; they have 413 miles of track and 5.2 million passengers and 7 million visitors each year. They are a significant element of the tourist industry and it is counterproductive and unfair for them to be burdened with unnecessary regulations, particularly as they are confined to a maximum line speed of 25mph. I hope that my noble friend will be able to provide some comfort on this.
Railway and Other Guided Transport Systems (Safety) Regulations 2006
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Faulkner of Worcester
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 16 May 2006.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Railway and Other Guided Transport Systems (Safety) Regulations 2006 .
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c79-80GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:01:23 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322116
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322116
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322116