My Lords, I am most grateful to the noble Baroness for clarifying the Government’s position. She suggested two reasons why the text of the Bill is sound: first, that a loan transaction between a registered party and a bank located not in the United Kingdom but in some other part of a member state would not constitute a transaction which fell within the provisions of the Treaty of Rome. With that judgment, I respectfully disagree. However, I understand the second arm of her argument which is that such a transaction may fall within the public policy provisions of the treaty, provisions which are an exception to all the fundamental freedoms of the treaty. I now understand that that is the basis upon which the Government are approaching this matter. So clarified, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
[Amendment No. 108 not moved.]
Electoral Administration Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Kingsland
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 15 May 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Electoral Administration Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c111-2 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 20:00:45 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_321716
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_321716
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_321716