Once again, that was a very helpful reply. Of course, I realise that the Healthcare Commission as an independent body needs to be able to act within its own discretion and that being over-prescriptive, particularly on the face of the Bill, is not appropriate. If my amendments are prescriptive—I appreciate that they are in some respects—they were intended to be very lightly so. But I note the Minister’s points in arguing against them. Particularly, I note for my own future reference the concept of signposting as distinct from a substantive legal point being made—a legal power being granted in the Bill. The notion of signposting is an interesting one and I will store that away for future deployment.
I shall read Hansard carefully to see what the Minister has said. It is unlikely that we will return to this issue on Report, but the Minister will understand if I reserve that option just in case. In the meantime, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
[Amendments Nos. 60 and 61 not moved.]
Health Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl Howe
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 15 May 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Health Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c52GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:42:06 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_321470
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_321470
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_321470