These things are always a matter of judgment. I accept that in this case it may be a matter of fine judgment. I recognise that the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee did not recommend the change that I have proposed in Amendment No. 104; nevertheless, I thought it was worth airing what I feel are important points. I would not have thought that the detail of a set of regulations was necessarily a showstopper in terms of the argument as to whether they should be affirmative or negative, but I shall take away what the Minister said and give it some thought.
As regards the drafting points that I raised, I am extremely grateful for the Minister’s undertaking to look again at the wording. If he comes back and tells me that the wording is alright as it is, I shall of course accept that. I can ask for no more than the undertaking he has given. With that, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Health Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl Howe
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 May 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Health Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c383GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:19:09 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320439
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320439
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320439