My Lords, it is wrong to demean this issue by describing it as box-ticking. The consequence of what is proposed is not box-ticking, but a considerable expansion in the amount of detailed work that takes place. That can by no means be described as box-ticking. That is the issue. If it were box-ticking, I would be much more relaxed about it.
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Sharman
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 10 May 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c1031
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 09:36:34 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320336
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320336
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320336