My Lords, I support the noble Baroness, Lady Noakes. The provision is surplus to requirements, as she has quite rightly said. The statute requires the appointment of an auditor and the basis on which he reports. It has long been a tenet of our corporate law that that is a requirement. We do not have to have separate disclosure of the terms of appointment. All you will get is disclosure of a contract which tells you more about what the auditors are not doing than what they are doing, and I challenge any shareholder to interpret it. It is quite otiose to suggest that this provision is needed.
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Sharman
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 10 May 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c1017 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 09:35:47 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320299
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320299
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320299