My Lords, I thank the Minister for his response and I am grateful for the illumination, which I had not fully appreciated, that the provisions relating to the FRRP apply only to information that it obtains compulsorily; I shall reflect on that. However, I believe that the word ““private”” is used elsewhere in clauses dealing with information going through gateways and that it is a general problem because it has not been defined. I am not sure whether the Minister’s answer is necessarily correct—not that I seek to suggest that he has given the wrong answer with any deliberate intent. I shall certainly consider his reply with my advisers and I hope that he, too, will look at this again. It is important that there should be a general understanding, because we are talking about the rights of individuals. For today, however, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Clause 444 [Permitted disclosure of information obtained under compulsory powers]:
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Noakes
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 10 May 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c970-1 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 09:34:51 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320231
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320231
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320231