My Lords, I thank my noble friend for that detailed response to the amendment. I appreciate hearing from him yet again his commitment to the ideals that lie behind this amendment: the social obligations that he feels that companies should accept and so on. I am sorry that it has not been possible to accept the ideas behind our amendment because it seems to me, as my noble friend Lord Judd has said, that it presents a possible way of ensuring that the objectives that everyone seems to agree on are adequately met. The idea was to produce a mechanism that has not been considered before, as far as I am aware, whereby those objectives could possibly be met. It would also mean that there would be a continuous requirement for consultation with appropriate outside organisations with some concern and some responsibility for social issues. In view of what has been said, I shall beg leave to withdraw the amendment. I shall read with some pleasure what the Minister said about the commitment at least to the objectives lying behind the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Clause 409 [Form and contents of summary financial statement: quoted companies]:
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Turner of Camden
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 10 May 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c952-3 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 09:46:11 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320195
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320195
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320195