I completely agree with what the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart, has said, particularly on the burden of proof. This is less favourable to the defendant. The prosecution has to prove beyond reasonable doubt either knowledge or that the individual ““ought reasonably to have known””.
This defence would have to be proved by the defence on the balance of probabilities. I adopt all that the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart, has said and have nothing to add to the brilliant way in which he said it. I, therefore, invite the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland, to withdraw his amendment.
Electoral Administration Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Falconer of Thoroton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 8 May 2006.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Electoral Administration Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c764-5 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 09:45:43 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320104
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320104
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320104