I am grateful to the noble and learned Lord; however, this is a significant issue. Although we now know a considerable amount about the identity of the donors—or the lenders—we have not had clearly put to us any significant cases in which loans have been made by non-permissible donors at a level which would cause a party serious embarrassment. That being the case, I think that the argument in favour of including our amendment is quite strong. Although we will consider the noble and learned Lord’s response, we may well wish to bring back this proposal at Report. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment No. 3, as an amendment to Amendment No. 1, by leave, withdrawn.
[Amendment No. 4, as an amendment to Amendment No. 1, not moved.]
Electoral Administration Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Goodhart
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 8 May 2006.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Electoral Administration Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c758-9 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 09:44:31 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320091
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320091
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320091