I am devastated that I did not have the opportunity to respond to my noble friend on those earlier amendments, so perhaps I may say on behalf of the Government that I accept the principle that the Bill should explicitly state what protection is provided to those providing information on claims for damages, including instances where there is no such protection.
I accept that the Bill should be amended and I should have liked to accept my noble friend’s amendment outright. However, I am told that, for all kinds of compelling procedural reasons, the current protections from damages have been consolidated as a result of my amendments which pre-empted my noble friend’s amendments. Therefore, I assure my noble friend that I will return on Report with amendments to address his concerns and I will seek to agree those amendments with him beforehand.
Clause 30, as amended, agreed to.
Clause 31 agreed to.
Clause 32 [Registers: duty to refer]:
Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Adonis
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 3 May 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c270-1GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:20:06 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319554
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319554
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319554