I thank the Minister for that explanation. However, I fail to see why someone who comes to a person’s home, without anyone else present, and performs a hands-on massage of that person should not be subject under the Bill to exactly the same provisions as someone delivering the same service in a hospital. I continue to be concerned.
I do not quite go along with what the Minister said about all this being an increasing burden on some of the organisations that provide, say, leisure and sporting activities. Most of those organisations, including Churches, already have provisions to safeguard children. It would not be too difficult to add vulnerable adults to them. Although the Minister says that people purchasing these services can go online and do the checks for themselves, many such people have quite a lot to worry about in their lives and it would be far better if that was done for them. I will go back, read what the Minister said and consult the people who have briefed me before deciding what to do with this group of amendments.
Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Walmsley
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 3 May 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c256GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:16:12 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319519
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319519
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319519