My Lords, the Minister will wonder whether he has had any support from his Benches or whether he has been thoroughly torpedoed below the waterline—which I suspect is the case.
The noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, is right. If it worked to have it in Clause 7 at new subsection (3C)(e) where the only difference is the words ““if any””—it is unlikely that a Secretary of State could not find anybody to consult but it is theoretically possible—then it is even more appropriate that it should be in Clause 8. As the noble Lord said, we must have consistency in legislation. I fully support the amendment tabled by the right reverend Prelate.
National Lottery Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Viscount Astor
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 24 April 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on National Lottery Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c31 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 12:09:16 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316755
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316755
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316755