I support what the noble Lord, Lord Monson, just said. It is ““more than one person””, which can mean two persons. Although this is a good amendment, I would go further. What is the rationale for not allowing two people who both smoke to share an office and smoke? It cannot at that point be that it is endangering the health of non-smokers. The clause is very restrictive.
Health Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Skidelsky
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 20 April 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Health Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c597GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:48:26 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316204
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316204
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316204