There is a lot of other evidence. I come back to the original point that I, the noble Lord, Lord Skidelsky, and others have made: it is possible to separate smokers from non-smokers. If people cannot believe that, I am afraid that there is no meeting of minds.
Before I was intervened on, I was going to say that I have a lot more to say on this matter, but I shall not do so because it is quite clear that the Committee wants to hasten through this particular part of the Bill. I shall come back to it and raise the points at other stages. I declare and believe that this is an important Bill; that it deserves the utmost scrutiny because it takes away freedoms that people have hitherto enjoyed; and that this Chamber is as entitled as the other House to have a good and proper debate and come to its own conclusions about what we should do.
With that, I will sit down, but I have to say that I do so feeling that the attitude of Members of this Committee and particularly that of the Government and the Whips have deprived me of a right which I believed that I enjoyed; but I am beginning to wonder whether I do.
Clause 1 agreed to.
Clause 2 [Smoke-free premises]:
Health Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Stoddart of Swindon
(Independent Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 20 April 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Health Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c587GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:13:00 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316174
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316174
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316174