The noble Baroness said that these were minor issues and that this was a matter of proportionality. Do I understand from that that there is some point at which she thinks particularly important issues should be on the face of the Bill? My question to her is whether the family home—the domestic residence—is something of sufficient importance to be on the face of the Bill. In that light, I hope very much that she would support the noble Lord and me. Our amendment is clear; it talks about ““a private dwelling””, which seems to me not to be a minor issue.
Health Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Naseby
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 20 April 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Health Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c552GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:23:02 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316090
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316090
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316090