Perhaps that it is a bit harsh. I shall say ““hypocritical”” instead. Here is a Minister who is advocating one set of circumstances and representing a Government who presented a Bill which said one thing and then, having spoken in favour of the Bill, votes against it. When I was in the House of Commons, I always believed—indeed, I was taught—that the vote follows the voice. In this case, the voice said one thing and the vote said something else. It was a completely and utterly disreputable incident during the passage of the Bill in the House of Commons.
Health Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Stoddart of Swindon
(Independent Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 20 April 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Health Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c549GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:45:04 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316081
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316081
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316081