May I add my good wishes to you, Mr. Speaker, on your recovery and return? The Chair seemed a little empty in your absence, and we are very glad to have you back.
I am deeply concerned about the singular attention given by Secretary of State to the mandate of the Democratic Unionist party. The DUP has a mandate—it has about a third of the votes in Northern Ireland—and I respect it. However, my party has a mandate, too, and I would like the Secretary of State and the DUP occasionally to respect it. Other parties have a mandate. Most of all, however, the Good Friday agreement has a mandate—a bigger mandate and a more significant one than any individual political party’s. It involves not just many of the political parties, but two Governments at national level and was endorsed by public referendum.
My concern also extends to the Secretary of State’s reference to changing institutions. Does he believe that any of the proposed changes will make any difference? It was not issues surrounding the change of institutions that brought the agreement down, so will the changes that he proposes help us in any way to restore it?
Northern Ireland
Proceeding contribution from
Alasdair McDonnell
(Social Democratic & Labour Party)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 18 April 2006.
It occurred during Ministerial statement on Northern Ireland.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
445 c30 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 23:43:50 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314855
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314855
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314855