I support the amendment moved by the noble Baroness, and in particular her comments on freedom of information, especially those on the performance of auditors. The Minister may not be aware of all the ramifications of chairing an audit committee, but like the noble Baroness, I am. One of the issues we are bound to deal with as audit committees is the effectiveness of the audit process. That is required both by the PCAOB and the Combined Code. How we are going to be able to deal with that process without having access to information in this country about the performance of auditors is, frankly, beyond me. We can do it for auditors registered under the PCAOB because we can look at the individual performances of firms and comment on them. In this country it is a just miasma and we need to do something about it.
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Sharman
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c427GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-12-17 19:40:27 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314287
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314287
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314287