We are not convinced that Amendments Nos. A233, A235 and A236 would clarify the application of Clauses 799 and 801. This is largely a matter of fashion in drafting practice. We do not think that the amendment is necessary. Amendment No. 234 would have the most undesirable effect of implying that writing must be in hard copy. We take the view that writing may be electronic.
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Sainsbury of Turville
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c413-4GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-12-17 19:40:21 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314250
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314250
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314250