I am grateful to the noble Lord for pointing out the omission in subsection (2). I am happy to accept Amendment No. A210.
I should like also to speak to Amendment No. A210A, which would remove overseas and unregistered companies from the requirements to notify appointments under this section. This subsection is unnecessary for unregistered companies as appropriate provision may be made by regulations under Clause 659. For overseas companies, the intention is to make appropriate provision under Part 25.
On Question, amendment agreed to.
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Sainsbury of Turville
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c389-90GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-12-17 19:40:17 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314205
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314205
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314205