I am disappointed. I thought that the Minister might say, ““This seems to be a sensible idea, perhaps it is not in the right form, and we should sweep it up in the positive response that we gave to the earlier amendment””. To have a situation in which we annotate records that are being disputed at Companies House seems the most elaborate and unsatisfactory way of keeping those important records in a fit state to be looked at by the public—which we all agree great reliance is placed on. The Minister has not said that. We will talk to the ICAEW, and we will reflect on what he said, but I think that we will be returning to this to have another look at it. It seems a very hamfisted way of doing things. In the meantime, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Clause 706 agreed to.
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c362GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-12-17 19:40:10 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314116
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314116
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314116