moved Amendment No. A193A:"Page 341, line 4, leave out ““there was”” and insert ““the registrar had””"
The noble Lord said: This is a simple amendment intended to improve the clarity of this clause. It would be far clearer if the clause read, ““The registrar may remove from the register anything that the registrar had power, but not duty, to include””, instead of, ““anything that there was power, but no duty””. As currently drafted, it is uncertain what or whose power is being referred to. It could mean, for example, the power of primary legislation, which would give the registrar power to remove anything he wished. I am sure that that is not what the Government intend. This amendment would make it clear that the powers referred to are those that the registrar, and no other body, holds. I beg to move.
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c358GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-12-17 19:40:10 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314108
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314108
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314108