The noble Viscount mentioned that he wanted something to be put in that was not there. I am saying that I cannot weigh it up. If I was preparing the report and there was a substantial international programme, frankly I would brag about it. I suspect that having an international programme would be popular with the ticket-buyers. Of course, some ticket-buyers would not like it but many would.
I do not know how prescriptive the Minister would want to be on an annual report but, if the international programme is significant, and a body is spending the kind of money that is to be spent here, I would expect there to be a significant paragraph and indeed financial information to set that out. However, it proves that lottery expenditure is a little like beauty: the benefit of it lies in the mind of the beholder. As we are concluding this stage, I thank the noble Viscount, his noble friends and the Minister for the work that has been done so far. We shall return on another occasion to think on these matters.
National Lottery Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Shutt of Greetland
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 21 March 2006.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on National Lottery Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c227 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 14:01:56 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_311098
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_311098
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_311098