Company Law Bill [HL]

I accept that as a perfectly proper response. I am grateful to the Minister. The only issue is that it would make it a bit clearer if it were in there. Clause 599 takes you back to ““register of interests””, and that takes you to Clause 600, which is ““Register to be kept available for inspection””. That is a slightly circuitous route to get back to the duty that the Minister asserts exists. He is clearly right. Our amendment was tabled because, again, a practitioner asked: ““Do they have to make it available for public inspection?”” So the practitioner had not picked up the fact that there was this circuitous route back with Clauses 599 and 600. At a technical level, the Minister is clearly right. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 607 agreed to. Clause 608 [Interest in shares: general]: