Perhaps I shall repeat the last paragraph. We have chosen to use language of giving instructions to cover this sort of situation; one could also describe it in terms of ““exercising rights””. The difference between the language of the Bill and that of the amendment is that ““exercising rights”” could cover a broader range of circumstances. We are grateful to the Law Society for raising the point, and we will think carefully about what the noble Lord said. At this stage we are reluctant to make any commitment to changing the current drafting. We need to consider further what additional rights would be covered by the wording that the noble Lord, Lord Sharman, proposes, and whether it is appropriate to refer to them all in this context. To date, our main concern has been simply to preserve the existing right of registered shareholders, and subsection (4)(b) is effective for that purpose.
Company Law Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Sainsbury of Turville
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c53GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:04:35 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310076
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310076
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310076