I do not think that we would keep the same effect if we moved subsection (6) into subsection (3), as subsection (5) states:"““The reduction of capital is not effective until those documents are registered””—"
that is, those provided for in subsection (6). It is that which we are seeking to uncouple. I hope that has dealt with the point, but perhaps we should reflect on what is printed in Hansard.
Company Law Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord McKenzie of Luton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c45-6GC
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:42:09 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310060
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310060
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310060