moved Amendment No. A89BA:"Page 282, line 12, after ““figure”” insert ““up””"
The noble Lord said: Although this seems a small change, it is necessary because the clause, as currently drafted, in step three seems to allow for a reduction of capital by a company, albeit inadvertent and unintended.
The amendment would make it clear that a company must round up to the nearest figure on any redenomination; to do otherwise would constitute a reduction of the company’s share capital. However, even under the earlier provisions of the Bill, there is no difficulty in the company increasing its capital, even where it may thereby exceed its authorised capital. We are advised that any reduction under this clause would not be covered by the provisions contained within Clause 582 entitled ““Reduction of capital in connection with redenomination””. This amendment is therefore necessary to ensure that companies do not fall foul of the requirements put upon them in this regard through the lack of one small word—““up””—in this clause. I beg to move.
Company Law Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c39-40GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:04:51 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310046
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310046
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310046