I understand the point that the Minister is making. However, I am not sure that in his remarks he has dealt with my point about the clause permitting redenomination, subject to conditions. If in fact this is restricted to the 15-day period referred to, it clearly significantly limits the conditions that in practice can be applied to the redenomination. For that reason I suggested a longer period. I have no pride in three months; I just think that in practical terms 15 days is too short. I certainly would not go so far as the year that the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, suggests because of the spot-rate point. I just think that in practical terms, if you are permitting conditions to be applied to the redenomination, 15 days is too short. I hope that, before we come back to this, the Minister could give some thought on whether 15 days is too short a period.
Company Law Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Razzall
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c36-7GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:04:46 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310037
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310037
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310037