moved Amendment No. A73F:"Page 272, line 45, at end insert ““if at the time of the assistance the subsidiary company is a public company””"
The noble Lord said: We are still in Clause 565, but we are looking at prohibitive financial assistance under new Section 151A. We seek to insert additional wording to the bottom of page 272. It is a clarificatory amendment, which addresses the point that the subsidiary covered by the prohibition must be a public company at the time that the assistance is given. For example, a private company could be taken public after the relevant assistance has been given. The amendment would address any retrospective argument that the assistance may have for any reason been invalidly given. Therefore, on the basis that this is for clarification, I beg to move.
Company Law Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c21GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:05:05 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310009
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310009
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310009