moved Amendment No. A67B:"Page 268, line 15, leave out ““(apart from subsection (2A))””"
The noble Lord said: We are on the same clause, but I am glad to say that I can be briefer on this amendment. New subsection (2B) does not, in our opinion, make sense. Why is new subsection (2A) excluded from the provisions? There appears to be no reason to single out new subsection (2A) as exempt from the company’s articles. This is a probing amendment and I hope that the Minister will give us some illumination on the logic behind this attack on new subsection (2A). I beg to move.
Company Law Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c6GC
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:35:23 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_309976
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_309976
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_309976