My Lords, I thank the Minister for her undertaking that Jeremy Oppenheim, the children’s champion at the immigration and nationality directorate, will meet the Children’s Commissioner to discuss the issue; that she will carefully review the legal implications of the amendment; and that she will ensure that a report will come to me on the problem. I appreciate greatly the assurances. The response is most encouraging and significant progress has been made since Report stage.
I also thank noble Lords who put their names to and spoke to the amendment in a helpful way. Perhaps I may recall that tonight at Yarl’s Wood families will be behind bars, seeing the officers there in their prison-style uniforms with their long keychains. I recall one mother’s question to me there on one of my visits: ““What do I tell my five year-old child when he asks me what he has done wrong to be placed here?””. It is a very difficult issue and it needs to be given careful attention. I am very grateful to the Minister for her encouraging response, and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Clause 62 [Commencement]:
[Amendments Nos. 35 and 36 not moved.]
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl of Listowel
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 14 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c1207 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 10:50:29 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308390
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308390
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308390