My Lords, I agree with all those who have spoken on this group of amendments. The noble Lord, Lord Dholakia, was absolutely right to describe these deprivations as very serious matters. Personally, I would much prefer to see such action being taken only after the grounds for taking it had been considered by a court. I concede that that may not always be possible, but when it is not, that is precisely when we need the words, ““the Secretary of State is satisfied”” and the further wording,"““seriously prejudicial to the vital interests of””."
I support all three amendments.
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hylton
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 14 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c1191 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 10:49:41 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308367
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308367
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308367