My Lords, I am most grateful to the noble and learned Lord. I do not want to keep jumping up, but I am not sure whether the noble and learned Lord the Attorney-General has answered my noble friend on whether we are to have primary legislation before there is any attempt to do away with the jury in any part of serious fraud cases. My understanding, before this debate, was that what my noble friend Lord Kingsland said was indeed what was agreed regarding the jury. Therefore, there is an awful lot to be said in answer to the points that the noble and learned Lord the Attorney-General is putting forward. There are very real points to be made, but I assume that they will be made in future primary legislation, and not this afternoon.
Fraud Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Lyell of Markyate
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 14 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Fraud Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c1129 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 10:54:45 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308265
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308265
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308265