I think that there are parallels with others who have to consider the accounts, which is the point that I made. I think the noble Baroness was drawing it with other professions, but other professions have different considerations than this very specific one. I think it is totally appropriate in this kind of professional advice. We are concerned here with a particular kind of problem which arises from the auditors’ report.
As it is so important that these new offences are properly understood, I am again grateful to the noble Baroness and the noble Lord for tabling the amendment and for giving me this opportunity to clarify further the meaning and intention of Clause 494.
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Sainsbury of Turville
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 14 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c412-3GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:30:19 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308104
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308104
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308104