As ever, it depends on the question which is asked. The distributors will not be asked, ““What is your most desirable No. 1 good, and how can we give you access to the appropriate resources to achieve that?”” We might get a plethora of answers or some that we would find it difficult to square with general public policy. After all, the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, indicated in his illustration the idiosyncrasies of public response on some matters. But there is a list of options, appropriate and specific, for awarding a grant. If such a list were put before the public, they could reach a wholly intelligent, acceptable and meritorious solution to a problem which would otherwise rack the brains of the distributors. The distributors have already engaged in public consultation, to good effect. I cannot see how that could be gainsaid by anyone. But the noble Viscount is indicating an open-ended question where the public would be asked to fill in the blank. That is not consultation as we understand it within the framework of the Bill.
National Lottery Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 13 March 2006.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on National Lottery Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c1036 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 09:50:40 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307517
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307517
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307517