Before the right reverend Prelate responds, let me say that I yield to no one in this House in my admiration for the Minister in charge of this Bill and the soothing way in which he handles it. He has a superb bedside manner. In the context of what he just said, however, I thought that he was being over-soothing. If it is true that the National Audit Office has calculated that the clause as it now stands would have reduced the Heritage Lottery Fund’s income by £15.7 million in 2003–04, that figure exceeds the total amount that English Heritage gives to the churches in a given year. That is not small change. If that is the effect of the clause, the Minister is being somewhat over-sanguine about what the consequences will be.
National Lottery Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 13 March 2006.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on National Lottery Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c1033-4 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 09:50:40 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307512
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307512
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307512