moved Amendment No. 27:"Page 5, line 19, after ““if”” insert ““without reasonable excuse””"
The noble Baroness said: My Lords, Amendment No.27 inserts a defence into Clause 8. A person who obstructs the regulator in the exercise of his powers could be committing an offence and would be liable, if found guilty, to a fine. There may be circumstances, of course, where the regulator is unintentionally pursuing the wrong person. The amendment will provide a safeguard in those circumstances for either authorised or unauthorised persons. Our legal advice is that this is a necessary addition to the Bill to protect those persons. A reasonable excuse would include circumstances where the regulator had genuinely mistaken the person and wrongly taken steps to prosecute him. I beg to move.
Compensation Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Ashton of Upholland
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 7 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Compensation Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c708-9 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-26 16:33:44 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_305889
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_305889
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_305889