UK Parliament / Open data

Compensation Bill [HL]

Proceeding contribution from Viscount Eccles (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 7 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bills on Compensation Bill [HL].
moved Amendment No. 21A:"Page 4, line 17, leave out sub-paragraph (i)." The noble Viscount said: My Lords, I briefly remind the House that Her Majesty’s prisons are full to overflowing, and that people are often taken to task for unfair trading. Indeed, there is a whole raft of legislation with remedies which cover these eventualities. Nevertheless, the Minister said in Grand Committee that prison sentences were needed to deal with persistent offenders. Surely it is very likely—indeed, it is almost certain—that persistent unfair trading will transgress existing legislation. I believe that the real problem will not be that the person has operated without authorisation, but will be what that person has done. Existing legislation, together with fines included in this Bill, will be an appropriate and proportionate remedy, and I do not believe that we need prison sentences. These standard prison sentences seem to be put in as a sort of reflex action, and we should give them careful thought. I beg to move.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c703 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top