UK Parliament / Open data

Terrorism Bill

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bills on Terrorism Bill.
My Lords, I beg to move that the Commons amendments and reasons be now considered. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to. COMMONS AMENDMENTS AND REASONS [The page and line references are to Bill 38 as first printed for the Lords.] Motion A 5 Clause 1, page 2, line 1, leave out subsection (4) and insert— ““(   )   For the purposes of this section, ““indirect encouragement”” comprises the making of a statement describing terrorism in such a way that the listener would infer that he should emulate it.”” 11 Clause 2, page 3, line 23, leave out subsection (4) 15 Page 3, line 46, leave out paragraphs (a) and (b) and insert ““anything mentioned in subsections (1), (1A) and (2)”” 28 Clause 3, page 6, line 25, leave out subsection (9) 31 Clause 20, page 18, leave out lines 13 and 14 32 Page 18, line 14, at end insert— ““““indirect encouragement”” comprises a statement describing terrorism in such a way that the listener would infer that he should emulate it;”” 34 Clause 21, page 19, leave out lines 29 to 44 and insert ““indirectly encourage terrorism, within the meaning of ““indirect encouragement”” as specified in section Terrorism Act 2006”” The Commons disagree to Lords Amendments Nos. 5, 11, 15, 28, 31, 32 and 34, but propose Amendments 34A and 34B in lieu— 34A Page 3, line 46, leave out paragraphs (a) and (b) and insert ““anything mentioned in subsections (1) to (4)”” 34B Page 19, line 39, leave out ““of a description”” and insert ““that is illustrative of a type””
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c136 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top