My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for his comments on the two amendments. I am still concerned, as he must be, with the variety of wording that we have in various Bills that he and I have dealt with regarding appointments. We do not as yet seem to have fixed on a standard form of words in Bills for the appointment of important officials such as the Commissioner for Older People. I am still mystified as to why regulations ““may make provision”” in paragraph 2 of Schedule 1, but the next paragraph begins, ““The Assembly must””. I would have thought that the prior regulations—the ones that may be made—are more essential and indeed a sine qua non to what follows in the succeeding paragraph. However, I have had the benefit of the Minister’s explanation and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
[Amendment No. 20 not moved.]
An amendment (privilege) made.
Commissioner for Older People (Wales) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Roberts of Conwy
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 15 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Commissioner for Older People (Wales) Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c1252 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 19:38:59 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_301965
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_301965
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_301965