UK Parliament / Open data

Company Law Reform Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Freeman (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 9 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bills and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill (HL).

I am grateful to the Minister. The National Association of Pension Funds, the Institute of Directors and the CBI will appreciate that offer to look at the matter further. If there are comments to be made and more specific arguments to be deployed, I will ensure that that happens. I do not intend to move Amendment No. 223B, because a large part of it has already been covered by the Minister’s general remarks and I do not wish to detain the Committee unnecessarily. However, I reserve my right to come back to the more general issues raised. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 210 agreed to. Clause 211 agreed to. Clause 212 [Qualifying third party indemnity provision]: [Amendment No. 223B not moved.] Clause 212 agreed to. Clauses 213 to 215 agreed to. Clause 216 [Ratification of acts of directors]:

Type

Proceeding contribution

Reference

678 c367GC

Session

2005-06

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords Grand Committee

Subjects

Disclosure of information

Conditions of employment

Contracts