Clause 206 replaces Section 318 of the Companies Act 1985. Under that section, companies are already required to keep a written memorandum setting out the terms of any director’s contract of service with the company or with a subsidiary of the company, if that contract is not in writing. The written memorandum must be open to inspection by members.
This seems to be an obvious anti-avoidance provision. Without it, the disclosure requirements imposed by this clause could be avoided simply by the director having an unwritten service contract. Section 318 of the Companies Act 1985 was considered by the Law Commissioners, and they did not note any difficulty with this particular requirement. A memorandum is nothing more than a proper written record of the terms of the contract or agreement.
Company Law Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Sainsbury of Turville
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 9 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill (HL).
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c362-3GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:11:00 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299643
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299643
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299643